City Council Meeting Summary

• The council focused on governance and financial oversight of the Toronto Parking Authority (TPA), weighing an in-house governance model, a broader governance review, and potential efficiencies within the TPA while also addressing the 2026 budget and related funding considerations. A key procedural decision in the excerpts was the deferral vote on the TPA matter (which was not carried) and a separate procedural item where a confirmatory-bills motion was later approved.

Five Most Important Topics Discussed

1) Governance and Oversight of the Toronto Parking Authority (TPA) - The council debated whether the TPA should remain an arms-length agency or be operated in-house, with governance questions central to future oversight. - Direct quotes: “The question is, should this agency be an arms-length agency or should it be operated by the city of Toronto?” and “I don't want to preempt the study... but I do know that in terms of capital financing, for example, there are advantages.”

2) Budget, State of Good Repair, and Financial Oversight for 2026 - Discussion covered the TPA’s role in funding capital needs and the implications for the city’s 2026 budget, including financing considerations tied to asset life cycles. - Direct quotes: “There would, however, be some opportunities to explore some initial findings,” and “There’s a big state of good repair budget that would have to be funded at the moment from revenues from the TPA.”

3) Procedural Conduct, Deferral, and Public Transparency - A deferral discussion highlighted concerns about timing, transparency, and public accountability, including the need for stakeholder engagement before major changes. - Direct quotes: “Let’s defer this for one cycle, get the folks in the room, have transparency and accountability to the public, and do this the right way,” and “There is no intent that this would be a permanent structure, but you couldn’t do that without some governance authority.”

4) Removal of the TPA Board and Governance Structure - The discussion questioned the rationale for removing the TPA board and moving to in-house governance, with concerns about public service implications and the impact on service delivery. - Direct quotes: “This is literally the only city agency that generates a revenue” and “I have faith in our public servants that they can find efficiencies within the existing operation of the Toronto Parking Authority.”

5) Cybersecurity and Inter-Agency Integration - The council touched on integrating agency operations (including the TPA) into the city’s cybersecurity framework to strengthen protection against attacks. - Direct quote: “We want different agencies to come and join with the City of Toronto so they would be protected within the city process.”

Opportunities for Public Input

• No explicit public-input channels were stated in these excerpts. The governance review and budget discussions, however, were presented as potential pathways for input in future sessions or through related channels.

Motions and Outcomes

• Motion to Defer the Item Regarding the Toronto Parking Authority

  • Outcome: Rejected (5 in favor, 14 against). The council did not defer the decision on the TPA item.

• Motion to Remove the Current TPA Board and Conduct a Study on the Toronto Parking Authority

  • Outcome: Not finalized in this section; discussions ongoing and subject to further deliberation.

• Motion to Grant Governance Authority to the CFO and City Manager (to enable financial reviews of city agencies, including the TPA)

  • Outcome: Pending; not resolved in this portion of the transcript.

• Motion to Introduce Confirmatory Bills for City Council Meeting #34

  • Outcome: Passed; confirmatory bills were declared as bylaws under Section 226.9 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

• Motion to Adjourn the Meeting

  • Outcome: Passed in the section addressing the confirmatory-bills process.

• Additional notes on other items (from connected excerpts)

  • Some motions and items related to the TPA governance model and 2026 budget discussions appeared across sections with outcomes either not finalized or pending, indicating ongoing deliberations beyond the excerpted moments.

Files, By-Laws, and Notable References

• Section 226.9 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006: referenced in relation to the confirmatory-bills/bylaws discussion (indicating bylaws were declared for City Council Meeting #34).
• No other specific file numbers were consistently cited in these excerpts beyond the above by-law reference.

Councillors Present (best-effort roster inferred from the excerpts)

• Councillor Burnside
• Councillor Pletcher
• Councillor Perks
• Councillor Bradford
• Councillor Fletcher
• Councillor Holiday
• Councillor Sachs
• Councillor Bravo
• Councillor Prit
• Councillor Carol
• Councillor Cole
• Councillor Niatta (Niatta)
• Councillor Perza
• Councillor Peruta
• Madam Speaker / Chair (presiding officer in various sections)
• Mayor (referenced as leading in some sections; names vary by excerpt)

Note: The excerpts provided span multiple meeting sections with overlapping or shifting participant rosters. The list above reflects names mentioned across the supplied sections and may not reflect a single, unified roster for one continuous meeting.